The WWE Universe was stunned when Roman Reigns, the dominant Tribal Chief, announced that he would be challenging Jacob Fatu instead of Solo Sikoa at the upcoming Bad Blood event. Fans had long expected a dramatic clash between Reigns and Sikoa, following their intense encounters in recent months. However, Reigns’ decision to target Jacob Fatu has left many wondering what led to this sudden change and why Solo Sikoa wasn’t chosen for this monumental fight.
The Rising Tension Within The Bloodline
Solo Sikoa, once seen as Roman Reigns’ loyal enforcer, has been at odds with The Tribal Chief ever since their relationship soured during the peak of The Bloodline saga. Many believed that Bad Blood would be the final chapter in their rivalry, with Sikoa stepping up to challenge Reigns for dominance within the family. The two had already shown signs of distrust, with Reigns frequently questioning Sikoa’s loyalty.
However, despite the growing tension, Reigns decided to turn his attention elsewhere. By challenging Jacob Fatu, a feared powerhouse with ties to the same Samoan dynasty, Reigns is sending a clear message that he is still in full control of his decisions – and that he doesn’t see Solo Sikoa as a legitimate threat just yet.
Why Jacob Fatu?
Jacob Fatu, known for his raw power and ferocity, has been making waves in the wrestling world. A member of the same prestigious Anoa’i family as Reigns and Sikoa, Fatu’s rise has been meteoric. His dominance in other wrestling promotions has caught the attention of WWE fans, and his arrival marks a new chapter in the ever-evolving Bloodline story. By choosing to fight Fatu, Roman Reigns might be attempting to reinforce his position as the true Tribal Chief – not just within WWE, but across the entire wrestling landscape.
The decision to face Jacob Fatu also suggests that Reigns wants to test his mettle against someone who can challenge his dominance in ways Solo Sikoa hasn’t been able to. Fatu’s relentless aggression and unpredictable nature make him a dangerous opponent, and Reigns is likely keen to prove that he can conquer even the toughest members of his family.
Why Not Solo Sikoa?
While Solo Sikoa remains a formidable force, there are a few reasons why Roman Reigns may have bypassed him for this major event. Firstly, Reigns may see Sikoa as unfinished business, someone who still needs to prove himself worthy of stepping into the ring for such a high-stakes match. Despite their clashes, Sikoa is still relatively new to the main event scene, and Roman Reigns may view Jacob Fatu as the bigger immediate threat.
Moreover, challenging Fatu allows Reigns to maintain an air of unpredictability. Fans were expecting a showdown with Solo Sikoa, but Reigns’ choice to go after Fatu adds an element of surprise. It also leaves the door open for future battles between Reigns and Sikoa, building tension and anticipation for when the time finally comes.
What’s Next For Solo Sikoa?
Though Solo Sikoa was overlooked for Bad Blood, this doesn’t mean his story with Roman Reigns is over. In fact, it’s likely only just beginning. Sikoa may view this snub as an insult, further fueling his desire to dethrone Reigns and prove himself as the rightful heir to the Bloodline. The brewing rivalry between the two could reach new heights after Bad Blood, setting the stage for an epic confrontation down the line.
For now, all eyes are on Bad Blood and the clash between Roman Reigns and Jacob Fatu. This match is sure to shake up the WWE landscape, but it also leaves plenty of unanswered questions about the future of the Bloodline. Will Solo Sikoa finally step out of Roman’s shadow, or will Reigns continue to solidify his reign as the undisputed Tribal Chief? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain – the battle for Bloodline supremacy is far from over.
